Subscribe to feed

Posts Tagged ‘Mawan’

2009-08-21-MAWAN

Dato Sri William made a wise move by apologising to SUPP on his recent remark on seat allocation for the BN component parties in Sarawak. Not many party President had openly apologise to another party or the general public over remarks they had made. Full news report here.

Out of context, I believe politicians should be brave enough to apologise for their ‘mistake’ or inability to serve the rakyat. It may not be what the YB wants, but sometimes these YBs should be responsible for the act of the agencies which are under them or within their constituency. Like the recent delivery of ‘fresh’ water supply to Sepupok Niah.

The YB or head of department may not have send the directive to deliver muddy water, but, they should take note of the quality of the deliveries. 1Malaysia or an Honour to Serve will be meaningless if the subordinates do not understand it and still take things for granted.

An investigation should be carry out to identify the culprit. What if the water delivered were contaminated? The lives of many rural communities would be in danger.

Kepada pegawai kerajaan yang terlibat, berfikir la sebelum buat.. Kalau anda tiday dapat meminum air itu, kenapa nak hantar juga? Tak boleh ke tanya pegawai atasan untuk mencari penyelesaian?

The statement by Dato Seri Tiong is something new to SPDP members. Most members would not be aware of it. Some may be aware of SPDP forming ‘club’ in Peninsular Malaysia, with the current formation of SPDP Club in Johor Baru, where 40,000 Ibans reside. Let us see if this move gets the support from its delegates during their coming TGM in December.

Extract from Malaysiakini

If this failed, said Ong, a Sarawak-based multiracial party would move into Peninsular Malaysia “to destroy MCA”. Alternatively, a newly-formed multiracial party would serve as a vehicle for dissidents to join Barisan Nasional (BN), thereby replacing MCA.

Tiong confirmed that SPDP, in which he is treasurer, has plans to set up branches in the peninsula. Describing this as a national issue, he slammed Ong for trying to obstruct his party’s expansion because of “a personal vendetta”.

He pointed out that MCA is a race-based party, while SPDP has a multiracial membership profile. As such, Ong “has no business meddling with the expansion plan”.

“We are all BN component parties, so what’s wrong with making inroads into Peninsular Malaysia? Some with a narrow political mindset think that parties from the peninsula can go into Sabah and Sarawak, but not vice versa,” Tiong reportedly said.

“Many new parties have been established in the peninsula. Why didn’t he make noise then?”

Asked why a Sarawak party would want to move into the peninsula, Tiong explained that the last general election had proved to be a watershed in politics.

“Many voters and members of political parties are disillusioned with the way BN and its component parties are run, but they don’t want to cross over to the opposition .

“So expanding SPDP would give them a choice (to join a new party) as we’re still under the BN banner. Does this mean it will destroy MCA and destablise BN?”

2009-08-19-KIDURONG

Dr. Chan responding to Dato Seri William and Dr. James Masing on issue of Kidurong state seat.

2009-08-18-MAWAN

By Churchill Edward and Saibi Gi
Source: The Borneo Post

Mawan, Masing say time to allocate constituency to another BN party since seat lost twice consecutively

KUCHING: Senior Barisan Nasional (BN) Dayak leaders believe that if there is to be any re-distribution of seats among the coalition parties, the Kidurong state constituency should be prioritised.

Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP) president Dato Sri William Mawan Ikom and Parti Rakyat Sarawak president Dato Sri Dr James Masing said they felt that this was apt, saying since the BN had lost twice consecutively in Kidurong, it may be timely that another BN component be given a chance to contest there in the next state polls.

Mawan and Masing were responding to a suggestion by Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin that BN should review allocation of seats among component parties to suit the needs of the electorate.

Mawan suggested a review of Kidurong when he said: “BN has lost the seat to DAP twice consecutively (in the state polls of 2001 and 2006) whereas every time (SPDP treasurer-general) Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing contested in the (Bintulu) parliamentary seat (which includes Kidurong state constituency), the BN won,” he said.

Masing who also felt the Kidurong state seat should be subjected to review, said: “BN will have to discuss how best not to lose that seat again.”

Mawan and Masing both revealed that the BN had an understanding that if a component party had lost twice consecutively in a particular constituency – be it parliamentary or state – the seat would be subjected to a review.

According to the two leaders, seat arrangement is not only a strategy but a serious matter to ensure a BN victory at all cost in the next state election, due latest by early 2011.

Kidurong has been allocated to Sarawak United People’s Party headed by Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Dr George Chan.

SUPP had lost the state seat twice to DAP’s Chiew Chiu Sing.

Apart from Kidurong, BN also lost in the Bandar Kuching parliamentary seat to the DAP twice consecutively – in 2004 and 2008 parliamentary elections.

The BN allocated this seat to SUPP twice but they lost it to state DAP secretary Chong Chieng Jen.

Mawan, also Minister of Social Development and Urbanisation, said he supported Khaled’s suggestion.

“To me, it has always been the understanding among BN components that the allocation of seats be reviewed from time to time or when the need arises. As a matter of principle the BN should also talk about it,” he said.

“That need arises if, for instance, BN loses a particular seat twice consecutively,” he added.

Mawan said when one talked about seat redistribution, the overall interest of the BN must come first rather than that of individual component parties.

“The minister’s (Khaled) suggestion is something we should be looking into because it is very practical. As far as he and the BN in West Malaysia are concerned, he has hit the nail on the head.

“If BN loses again in any particular seat, we can say that BN as a whole is losing. So it is imperative for the BN to gain public confidence and return to its winning ways,” he said.

“Any individual component should not be self-centred. What is the point of being self-centred when one drags BN to lose seats? This will slowly weaken the BN and erode the spirit of teamwork,” he said.

“If a review is made, component parties must not interpret this as a ‘plus or minus’ thing but rather a strategy to win seats or win back seats it has lost,” he said.

According to him, if BN wins big the next time around, interest of every component party will be better taken care of.

On the Sarawak front, Mawan said he would let the BN leadership decide on seat allocation because this, according to him, is a major strategy rather than plan to boost the self -esteem of any individual party.

He said boosting self-esteem was something that could not be entertained in this current political time.

Masing who is the Land Development Minister, said Khaled was basically referring to the state of the BN in Peninsular Malaysia when he suggested his idea.

Nonetheless, he said even though the BN seat arrangement in Sarawak seemed to be working better than that in the Peninsula, the state BN must study the impact of such review carefully.

“The minister’s (Khaled) suggestion is something worthwhile looking into because of demographic changes which can occur in any seat over a period of time. This has been the understanding of the state BN,” he said.

According to Masing, there are things which the BN must tackle urgently to win back lost seats, including the swapping of seats among components.

Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) vice president Datuk Daud Abdul Rahman said the state BN would only review seat arrangement if the grassroots demanded it.

However, the state BN may not want to disrupt the equilibrium of power by subtracting or adding seats of component members.

According to Daud, the state BN may want to maintain the status quo when it comes to the numbers’ game.

“PBB may be the backbone of BN in Sarawak but PBB will never resort to taking away seats already allocated to other components,” he insisted.

“What may happen is the swapping of seats by taking into account what the grassroots want,” he said.

He said he believed the allocation of seats depended heavily on the strength of parties in areas they represented.

“We must go back to the reality that BN’s victories in elections depend very much on the votes of the majority and that BN subscribes to the concept of power-sharing,” he said, urging component parties to be mindful of the political sensitivities surrounding the issue.

“BN elected representatives serve all races and communities regardless which component they come from,” he said.

PBB Youth chief Fadillah Yusof, meanwhile, said BN elected representatives must have quality and integrity as well as the sincerity to serve the people.

He said he agreed with Khaled’s suggestion to study the demography of each area when BN should decide to review seat allocation.

2009-08-14-MAWAN-SM

This is just what charity dinner organisers needed. A good reminder to those Super Pledgers to pay up what you have pledge over the years (for some).

Having involved in organising dinners and having to jot down the amount pledge by Datuk Datuk, Datin Datin, YB YB and etc.. the job of following up with this pledges is sure a lengthy one. I have a few that has been in our minutes of meeting for years, and soon it will appear again during our BGM!

This year our Bidayuh brother was the organiser of the Divisional Gawai Dayak. They too faced the same problem. It sounds so easy for YB YB Datuk Datuk to pledge during this event and during the committee meeting, things are said and requested as if the organiser have tonnes and tonnes of fund to organise it.

There is also cases of troupe members (yalarr the people who perform during dinners) who are being promised of some token money, and if the amount are in the millions (well some million are only good on paper – and that too involve poor rural commuities), we can understand, but if it involve RM10, RM30 per person.. aiyooo! Cakap pun tarak guna! Bayar lah secepat mungkin and let not minute itover and over, year after year.. konon nya waiting for MRP this and MRP that, budget this and budget that..

The best principle is YB YB Datuk Datuk – DON’T PLEDGE IF YOU CAN’T DELIVER IT WITHIN THE NEXT 30-DAYS.. because during the next 30 days, we will be having our post mortem meeting! That’ll be minute in our minutes of meeting.

Today, when this YB YB Datuk Datuk pledge, we buat dhuhhh saja. Because for a very simple reason.. we can only appreciate it when we see the cheque.

Page 2 of 212