Subscribe to feed

JAMESJG.COM highlighted the wrong version of our State Flag on the header of the Sarawak Government official portal recently.

We made a quick visit this evening to see if the correct flag has been use. Yupp… the header has been changed and the correct flag being used.

Thank you to the State Information Dept for their fast action to notify the webmaster of the portal. However, the usage of the wrong flag is widely used in Sarawak, which could show the lack of patriotism among Sarawakian today.

Maybe the Information Dept can issue a directive to all agencies, corporate bodies and the media on the correct flag (both horizontal and vertical versions) and their way of usage. During the time of writing this post, we have observed that three types of flag have been wrongly displayed, including the latest one, which uses a ‘fat’ star.

There must be a mechanism to check that the suppliers of the state flag supply the correct one to the public. Worst to worst, the state flag should only be produced/supply by authorised supplier(s) of the state government.

Till then.. selamat hari raya aidilfitri, maaf zahir dan batin to all my muslim readers.

Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud looks set to lead the Sarawak Barisan Nasional (BN) into the next state elections, irrespective of whether he did indicate that he might call it quits one of these days, or that there could be some detractors.

The general feeling in the state is that the chief minister is the man for Sarawak at this moment.

Denis Waitley, a renowned American author, once said: “There are two primary choices in life; to accept conditions as they exist, or accept the responsibility for changing them.”

It looks like members of Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) do not want to rock the boat and want their president, Taib, to lead as he is said to be the only one capable of upholding unity among the various party leaders and component parties in the Sarawak BN.

And that is a very strong criteria for leading the state, and a loud message was put forward at PBB’s Supreme Council meeting in Kuching on Sunday. The unanimous decision certainly reflected Taib’s strong standing within his party.

Party insiders said members of PBB’s inner circle are concerned that should Taib, who has been Sarawak’s chief minister since 1981, relinquish his top party position before the state elections, it could destabilise the party as well as Sarawak BN.

“Most of the people (in Sarawak BN) are concerned about Taib not being at the helm in the election. Whatever you say about him, he has strong leadership to ensure that things are in place in the battlefield and that the election machinery is united under one command.

“Should Taib decide to step down now, how will his successor keep the party together, especially in handling issues such as potential candidates and the internal power play that will affect the machinery during the campaign period?” a party insider asked.

The insider told Bernama that any premature decision on Taib’s part to step down at this juncture would surely destabilise the party.

And that explains why PBB deputy president Tan Sri Alfred Jabu revealed on Sunday that the 71 PBB branches in the state had drafted a pledge of allegiance to Taib to continue to lead as chief minister, Sarawak BN chairman and PBB president.

Citing Taib’s leadership as crucial and a necessity to sustain Sarawak’s political stability, peace, harmony and uninterrupted unity, Jabu specifically mentioned that the state still needed Taib in maintaining discipline to ensure strong cooperation among the BN component parties, guaranteeing excellent performance and high integrity in BN.

It is common knowledge among political circles that PBB members are also aligned to Jabu, deputy president II Datuk Seri Abang Johari Tun Abang Haji Openg, senior vice-president 1 Datuk Seri Awang Tengah Ali Hassan and newly-appointed special adviser and former federal natural resources and environment minister Datuk Seri Adenan Satem.

Another party insider said Taib had personally briefed the party supreme council members on Sunday on his succession plan and explained the controversy surrounding his earlier remark on his willingness to step down.

The details were not relayed to the media as they were not meant for publication except for a statement issued by PBB that its grassroots leaders continued to support Taib.

None of the supreme council members was willing to comment on the succession plan, when contacted, except to say that they supported Taib to continue to lead the state and party.

The potential successors are likely to come from those in PBB’s inner circle being groomed to take over the top leadership. They include Jabu, Abang Johari and Awang Tengah.

But then again, others also cannot be ruled out. Take Adenan, the state assemblyman for Tanjung Datu, for example. He has been appointed Special Advisor in the Chief Minister’s Office responsible for public affairs from April 2 this year and is accorded full ministerial status.

The appointment of Adenan as special advisor to Taib has also sparked much debate in the political arena.

Adenan was once tipped to replace Taib but fell out of favour with the chief minister in 2006 and has since been lying low.

In the past, a number of PBB leaders were said to have been picked to take over the helm, including the late Tan Sri Dr Sulaiman Daud, Datuk Seri Effendi Norwawi, Datuk Bujang Ulis and Datuk Abang Abu Bakar Mustapha. However, nothing much happened.

In 2006, Taib hinted that he would have one last shot as chief minister for the current term of the state administration which expires in June next year.

But for the next state elections, it looks like Taib will still be calling the shots.

Source: BERNAMA, 7th Sept. 2010

Finally… a BIG THANK YOU to Miri City Council for the upgrading works. We hope the various contractors will perform a good work, and we should be expecting a smooth ride on it (not like the current Pujut Flyover-GK-Pujut 7 Roundabout which features a slight shake-on-your-butt ride, after the recent resurfacing work!!)

We have two versions of the Sarawak state flag. We can see both versions almost everywhere. Government offices, shopping complexes and even at our very own Sarawak Government Official Portal!

JAMESJG.COM is also confused of which one is the real OFFICIAL version. Look at the pointed end of the star. One is pointing upwards (as shown in the explanation area) and the other have the pointed end pointing downwards (as shown on the header banner).

We hope the Information Department can call for a press conference on which is the OFFICIAL version and how it should be hang.. since our actual Independence Day is fast approaching in September.

Its a cold morning, and the rain has not stop since yesterday. After sending a marine captain for his safety training, nothing is better than a hot bowl of pork rib noodle with hot tea over at Happy Garden at Krokop Lorong 10. Thomas and Juan joined me later for more pork rib! Give it a try and it only cost RM4 per serving.

As we enjoy our noodle, flipped through the sundaypost, I found this interesting photo of the CEOs of Facebook launching their latest feature with the gong. The gong looks very much similar to our Dayak gong. I wonder where did that gong came from.

Where it comes from is another story, but the new Facebook feature will allow us to share our location. Beep beep.. you never know that your so-called friend (the ones who uses funny profile pics instead of their real portrait pic) are just a few meters away.. hahahahaa!

And finally, to roundup the week, I would like to share with you an article at Borneo Post. Sarawak will never be part of May 13, so don’t drag us with it.

Stop bringing up the ugliness of May 13, please

August 21, 2010, Saturday
Source: http://www.theborneopost.com/?p=60267

“REMEMBER May the 13th, the Chinese-Malay riots.It was sad to see the fabric of Malaysia’s society moving in opposite directions, and if they need to look for a guilty party, then both sides only need to look in the mirror.

I hope Malaysians know that racial harmony and tolerance are more than just words. All have to work hard to preserve that fabric in our society.”

That statement by a blogger is a timely reminder of what may occur if politicians start hurling racial tirades at each other. And this is exactly what has been happening in Kuala Lumpur this week. Unfortunately, it is the top leaders in the country who are not behaving as they should have.

Why? I think it’s all because of their desire to score political points among their respective communities. This does not augur well for politics in the country. In the heat of it all, MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek seemed to tread on unfamiliar ground when he practically told Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin off.

In their public quarrel, Chua urged Muhyiddin to recognise that the socioeconomic conditions in Malaysia have changed and thus there was no need to invoke memories of the 1969 racial riots.

Chua expressed “disappointment” with Muhyiddin’s statement when the DPM reminded MCA of the May 13 incident, adding that discussions on the country’s future need not be clouded by racial sentiments.

“The socioeconomic conditions in Malaysia today are totally different from that in 1969 and Malaysians are capable of having rational discussions without beating the racial war drum.

“All we ask for is a fair share. Rest assured that the MCA has no plans or interest to deprive other communities of what is rightfully theirs,” said Chua. Chua and Umno leaders have been engaging in a war of words following the MCA-organised Chinese Economic Congress last Saturday, which among others, called for a reduction in the federal government’s 30 per cent Bumiputera equity targets.

Defending the congress’ 13 resolutions, Chua said neither the MCA nor the congress had touched on the special rights of the Bumiputera community.

In this public spat, I have to be on the side of Dr Chua. It’s not because I’m  Chinese. Frankly, I am not impressed with Chua’s presidency of the MCA so far. If the MCA claims that the party is representing Chinese Malaysians and that Chua is the leader of Malaysian Chinese, I don’t think I can accept that.

I am a Sarawakian and I am unable to accept Chua as my leader.

Why? His political baggage is too ‘heavy’ and I do not want to carry it for him. I’m sorry for being judgemental but it’s difficult to accept too that he took over the MCA presidency by ‘betraying’ the former leader, his own party president then. In politics, we should all behave like gentlemen.

But I’m backing Chua in his row with Umno leaders because I feel that it’s totally unnecessary to bring up the ugliness of a racial riot like the May 13 incident whenever differences of opinions crop up among politicians. May 13 is a shameful episode in our nation’s history. It is best buried and forgotten. Yes, Malaysians have learnt a lesson from it and that’s good enough.

Having recognised that, we have to move on and not be clouded by that unfortunate blast in our history. Surely, there is nothing much to gain by invoking such a painful memory of people losing their lives because of some silly politics. It was a time when Malaysians forgot that they were Malaysians. Now, we must never forget that we are all Malaysians.

Unfortunately, the MCA-Umno racial spat came about at a time when Malaysians are about to celebrate National Day on Aug 31. Surely, the celebratory mood has been dampened. For us in Sarawak, let’s be thankful that we can now officially celebrate our Independence Day on Sept 16. For the people of Sarawak and Sabah, I am doubtful that they get emotional when talking about May 13.

Others may not share my sentiments but allow me to use myself as an example of why May 13 is just another day. In 1969, I was in Form 1 – still naive and uninterested about major happenings in the country.

I cannot recall anything about May 13 at all. I knew nothing about politics or elections.

All I knew was that Tunku Abdul Rahman was the Prime Minister of Malaysia and that the Chief Minister of Sarawak was Datuk Penghulu Tawi Sli.

And hey, May 13 took place in Kuala Lumpur – that’s so far away. It’s another faraway land and not in Sarawak or Sabah.

I’m sure that even today, the people of East Malaysia still hardly feel anything for May 13. Sabahans would probably feel more for the air crash that took the lives of their Chief Minister Tun Donald Fuad Stephens and several cabinet ministers on June 16, 1976.

Why? It happened at home, of course. Forty-one years later, I have to say that I don’t feel much for the May 13 incident. If people in Kuala Lumpur want to riot and kill each other because of their racist streak, that’s their business. I want no part of it. In fact, I detest it whenever the incident is brought up. I think it’s unfair to include Sarawakians and Sabahans when leaders use the May 13 racial riots as a warning for possible racial dissent. As far as I’m concerned, there is hardly any racial issue in Sarawak.

Dayaks, Chinese, Malays and others in Sarawak are a different breed altogether and this is something which we have proudly held on to.

Indeed, the racial harmony and Sarawak is something which those across the South China Sea should emulate and nurture. Then, there will be no more necessity for reminding Malaysians of the ugliness of the May 13 race riots. In fact, it should have been buried in the dustbin of history long ago.

So please you guys in Kuala Lumpur, if you want to quarrel over racial issues, please do not drag us, Sarawakians, into your fight. We want no part of it. And again, please be reminded that May 13 is a very West Malaysian episode of shame. None of us over this side were involved. Please don’t keep on reminding us of such an ugly event.

(Comments can reach the writer at paulsir99@ hotmail.com)

Page 30 of 158« First...1020...2829303132...405060...Last »